REMOTE SETTING OF <i>Nodipecten nodosus</i> (Linnaeus 1758) LARVAE

  • Robson Cardoso COSTA Universidade do Vale do Itajaí – UNIVALI; Centro Experimental de Maricultura - CEMar, Centro de Ciência Tecnológicas da Terra e do Mar - CTTMAR, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-4097
  • Gilberto Caetano MANZONI Universidade do Vale do Itajaí – UNIVALI; Centro Experimental de Maricultura - CEMar, Centro de Ciência Tecnológicas da Terra e do Mar - CTTMAR, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4401-8267
  • Francisco Carlos da SILVA Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC; Centro de Ciências Agrárias - CCA; Departamento de Aquicultura; Laboratório de Moluscos Marinhos - LMM, http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4283-7357
  • Carlos Henrique Araújo de Miranda GOMES Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Departamento de Aquicultura, Laboratório de Moluscos Marinhos, http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6533-9249
  • João Paulo Ramos FERREIRA Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Departamento de Aquicultura, Laboratório de Moluscos Marinhos - LMM http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3978-3984
  • Claudio Manoel Rodrigues de MELO Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Departamento de Aquicultura, Laboratório de Moluscos Marinhos - LMM http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0969-7022

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the growth and survival of Nodipecten nodosus larvae grown in a remote settlement system. Two forms of transport were tested, one in a humid/wet, environment and one submerged in seawater, with a control treatment maintained at the Laboratory of Marine Mollusks (LMM). After transport treatments, individuals were populated simultaneously inside floating boxes directly at sea and in containers under controlled conditions in the Laboratory of the Experimental Center for Mariculture (CEMAR). No statistical differences were observed in larval survival relative to the method of transport in the different experiments. However, statistical differences were observed in evaluation 1 (EVA1) for the survival and growth of larvae transported in submerged seawater and settled in the laboratory. No statistical difference was observed between the control and either wet/humid or submerged treatments in EVA2. The survival values in the control treatment in EVA3 were higher (p<0.05) in relation to the wet and submerged treatments cultivated in the laboratory. It was not possible to observe the presence of pre-seeds in treatments grown at sea. Is possible to transport larvae for 6 hours of travel to be settled in controlled conditions far from their place of origin.

References

American Public Health Association – APHA, American Water Works Association – AWWA, Water Environment Federation – WEF. 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water e wastewater. 21st ed. Washington: APHA, AWWA, WEF. 8p.

Avendaño, M.; Cantillánez, M.; Riascos, J.M. 2019. The decreasing availability of settlement surfaces affects the transition from larvae to early recruitment of the scallop Argopecten purpuratus through El Niño and La Niña episodes. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6: 630. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00630.

Avendaño-Herrera, R.; Riquelme, C.; Silva, F. 2002. Utilización de biopelículas bacterianas en el asentamiento de larvas de Argopecten purpuratus (LAMARK, 1819) en un hatchery comercial. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía, 37(1): 35-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-19572002000100006.

Bourne, N.; Hodgson, C.A.; Whyte, J.N.C. 1989. Manual for scallop culture in British Columbia. Canada: Fisheries and Oceans. 215p.

Brand, A.R. 2006. Scallop ecology: distributions and behaviour. In: Shumway, S.E.; Parsons, G.J. (Ed.). Scallops: biology, ecology, and aquaculture. USA: Elsevier. p. 651-713.

Carvalho, Y.B.M.; Ferreira, J.F.; Da Silva, F.C.; Bercht, M. 2013. Factors influencing larval settlement of the Atlantic lion’s paw scallop, Nodipecten nodosus. Journal of Shellfish Research, 32(3): 719-723. http://dx.doi.org/10.2983/035.032.0313.

Chan, G.M. 1990. Study on resistance of the Japanese scallop spat to reduced salinity. In: Morkovtsev, V.G. (Ed.). Scientific and technical problems of mariculture in the country. Vladivostok, Russia. 127 p.

Chauvaud, L.; Thouzeau, G.; Paulet, Y. 1998. Effects of environmental factors on the daily growth rate of Pecten maximus juveniles in the Bay of Brest (France). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 227(1): 83-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(97)00263-3.

Christophersen, G.; Strand, Ø. 2003. Effect of reduced salinity on the great scallop, Pecten maximus, spat at two rearing temperatures. Aquaculture, 215(1-4): 79-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00094-7.

De La Roche, J.P.; Louro, A.; Roman, G. 2005. Settlement of Chlamys varia (L.) in the hatchery. Journal of Shellfish Research, 24(2): 363-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.2983/0730-8000(2005)24[363:SOCVLI]2.0.CO;2.

Friedman, G.M.; Sanders, J.E.; Kopaskamarkel, D.C. 1992. Principles of sedimentary deposits. New York: Macmillam. 717p.

Galtsoff, P.S. 1964. The American oyster Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin). USA: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 480p. (Fish Bulletin).

Gosling, E. 2004. Bivalve molluscs: biology, ecology and culture. Oxford:Blackwell Science. 443p.

Heath, W.A. 2001. Handling and Shipping of Live Northeast Pacific Scallops: Larvae to Adults. In: Marketing and Shipping Live Aquatic Products: Second International Conference and Exhibition, Seattle, Washington, nov./1999. Proceedings... Alaska: University of Alaska Sea Grant College Program. p.111-122.

Helm, M.M.; Bourne, N.; Lovatelli, A. 2004. Hatchery culture of bivalves: a practical manual. Rome: FAO. 471 p. (FAO Fisheries Technical Paper).

Hodgson, C.A.; Burke, R.D. 1988. Development and larval morphologic of the spiny scallop, Chlamys hastata. The Biological Bulletin, 174(3): 303-318.

Jones, G.; Jones, B. 1988. Advances in the remote setting of oyster larvae. Canada: British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. 88p.

Kinne, O. 1964. The effects of temperature and salinity on marine and brackish water animals. II Salinity and temperature salinity combinations. Oceanography and Marine Biology - an Annual Review, 2: 281-339.

Laing, I. 2000. Effect of temperature and ration on growth and condition of king scallop Pecten maximus spat. Aquaculture, 183(3-4): 325-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00262-8.

Laing, I. 2002. Effect of salinity on growth and survival of king scallop spat (Pecten maximus). Aquaculture, 205(1): 171-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00663-9.

Lu, Y.T.; Blake, N.J.; Torres, J.J. 1999. Oxygen consumption and ammonia excretion of larvae and juveniles of the bay scallop, Argopecten irradians concentricus (Say). Journal of Shellfish Research, 18(2): 419-423.

Maeda-Martínez, A.N.; Sicard, M.T.; Reynoso-Granados, T. 2000. A shipment method for scallop seed. Journal of Shellfish Research, 19(2): 765-770.

Magnesen, T.; Bergh, O.; Christophersen, G. 2006. Yields of great scallop, Pecten maximus, in a commercial flow through rearing system in Norway. Aquaculture International, 14(4): 377-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10499-005-9039-5.

Marenzi, A.W.C.; Branco, J.O. 2005. O mexilhão Perna perna (Linnaeus) (Bivalvia, Mytilidae) em cultivo na Armação do Itapocoroy, Santa Catarina, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 22(2): 394-399. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752005000200013.

Navarro, J.M.; Gonzalez, C.M. 1998. Physiological responses of the Chilean scallop Argopecten purpuratus to decreasing salinities. Aquaculture, 167(3-4): 315-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00310-X.

Novaes, A.L.T.; Souza, R.V.; Della-Giustina, E. 2016. Métodos para obtenção de sementes de mexilhões alternativos à retirada de bancos naturais. Florianópolis: Epagri. 116 p. (Boletim Didático).

Resgalla Junior, C. 2011. The holoplankton of the Santa Catarina coast, southern Brazil. Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences, 83(2): 575-588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37652011000200017.

Rios, E.C. 1985. Seashells of Brazil. Rio Grande: Fundação Cidade do Rio Grande. 432p.

Rios, E.C. 1994. Seashells of Brazil. 2ª ed. Rio Grande: Fundação Universidade do Rio Grande. 492 p.

Robert, R.; Gérard, A. 1999. Bivalve hatchery technology: the current situation for the Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas and the scallop Pecten maximus in France. Aquatic Living Resources, 12(2): 121-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0990-7440(99)80021-7.

Roland, W.G.; Broadley, T.A. 1990. A manual for producing oyster seed by remote setting. Canada: British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Aquaculture and Commercial Fish. 58p.

Román, G.; Martínez, G.; García, O.; Freites, L. 2001. Reproducción. In: Maeda-Martínez, A.N. (Ed.). Los moluscos pectínidos de Iberoamérica: ciencia y acuicultura. México: Limusa. p. 27-59.

Rupp, G.S. 2009. Status of scallop Aquaculture in Brazil. Bulletin of the Aquaculture Association of Canada, 107(1-2): 66-69.

Rupp, G.S.; Parson, G.J.; Thompson, R.J.; de Bem, M.M. 2005. Influence of environmental factores, season and size at deployment on growth and retrieval of postlarval lion’s paw scallop N. nodosus (L.) from a subtropical environment. Aquaculture, 243(4): 195-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.10.007.

Rupp, G.S.; Parsons, G.J. 2006. Scallop aquaculture and fisheries in Brazil. In: Sandra, E.; Shumway, G.; Parsons, J. (Ed.). Scallops: biology, ecology and aquaculture. Amsterdan: Elsevier. p. 1225-1250.

Rupp, G.S.; Parsons, G.J.; Thompson, R.J.; de Bem, M.M. 2004. Effect of depth and stocking density on growth and retrieval of the postlarval lion’s paw scallop, Nodipecten nodosus (Linnaeus, 1758). Journal of Shellfish Research, 22(2): 473-482.

Rupp, G.S.; Valdéz-Ramírez, N.E.; Fonseca, M.L. 2011. Biología y ecología. In: Maeda-Martínez, A. N.; Lodeiros-Seijo, C. (Ed.). Biología y cultivo de los moluscos pectínidos del género Nodipecten. México: Limusa. p. 26-58.

Rupp, G.S.; Parsons, G.J. 2004. Effects of salinity and temperature on the survival and byssal attachment of the lion’s paw scallop Nodipecten nodosus at its southern distribution limit. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 309(2): 173-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2004.03.018.

Santos, A.A.; Costa, S.W.; Giustina, E.G.D. 2017. Síntese informativa da Maricultura 2016. Florianópolis: EPAGRI. 8 p. Available from: Accessed: 19 dec. 2020.

Sarkis, S.; Helm, M.; Hohn, C. 2006. Larval rearing of calico scallops, Argopecten gibbus, in a flow-through system. Aquaculture International, 14: 527-538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10499-006-9052-3.

Schettini, C.A.F.; Carvalho, J.L.B.; Truccolo, E.C. 1999. Aspectos hidrodinâmicos da enseada da Armação do Itapocoroy, SC. Facimar, 3(1): 99-109.

Shumway, S.E.; Parsons, G.J. 2016. Scallops: biology, ecology, aquaculture, and fisheries. 3th ed. Oxford: Elsevier. 1214p.

Sturmer, L.; Adams, C.; Supan, M.; John, E. 2003. Enhancing seed availability for the hard clam (Mercenaria mercenaria) aquaculture industry by applying remote setting techniques. Gainesville: National Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Department of Commerceís National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 44p.

Sühnel, S.; Lagreze, F.; Ferreira, J.F. 2008. Recuperation of Nodipecten nodosus scallop spats (Linnaeus, 1758) after different periods of permanence in laboratory and in the sea. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca, 34(1): 39-47.

Suplicy, F.M.; Manzoni, G.C.; Costa, R.C. 2017. Aprimoramento da técnica de assentamento remoto de sementes de mexilhão: situação atual e perspectivas futuras. Panorama da Aquicultura, (27): 46-55.

Uriarte, L.; Rupp, G.S.; Abarca, A. 2001. Producción de juveniles de pectínidos iberoamericanos bajo condiciones controladas. In: Maeda-Martínez, A.N. (Ed.). Los moluscos pectínidos de Iberoamérica: ciencia y acuicultura. México: Limusa. p. 147-171.

Velasco, L.A.; Barros, J. 2008. Experimental larval culture of the Caribbean scallops Argopecten nucleus and Nodipecten nodosus. Aquaculture Research, 39(6): 603-618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.01917.x.

Widman, J.C.; Rhodes, E.W. 1991. Nursery culture of the bay scallop, Argopecten irradians irradians, in suspended mesh nets. Aquaculture, 99(3-4): 257-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(91)90246-4.

Zanette, G.B.; Ferreira, J.F.; Silva, F.C.; Pereira, A.; Melo, C.M.R. 2009. Influence of the type of collector and collector preparation periods on the settling rate of the scallop Nodipecten nodosus L. in the laboratory. Aquaculture Research, 40(13): 1451-1458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.02157.x.
Published
2020-12-14
How to Cite
COSTA, Robson Cardoso et al. REMOTE SETTING OF Nodipecten nodosus (Linnaeus 1758) LARVAE. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca, [S.l.], v. 46, n. 3, dec. 2020. ISSN 1678-2305. Available at: <https://www.pesca.sp.gov.br/boletim/index.php/bip/article/view/1524>. Date accessed: 23 may 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.20950/1678-2305.2020.46.3.579.